neoliberalism
Neo-liberalism is dead! Long live neo-liberalism!
It was November 2008 and it happened at the London School of Economics’ School of Management. The city was trembling above the shockwaves of a devastating financial crisis yet Professor Luis Garicano had good reason to be cheerful, at least on the beginning of the particular day we’ve got scene-setting cause to look back on him. As the Departmental Head he was leading The New Academic Building’s[1] opening ceremony and the event had attracted a large and illustrious crowd.
Friendship and counter-conduct in the neoliberal regime of truth
Introduction and context
Today we live in an era of social and economic crises. As neoliberalism has established itself as a hegemonic regime, the dark side of neoliberalism has come into sharp relief. Empirical data show that in all examples of implementing neoliberal policies, we can observe that it is only a small minority who benefits, while the majority is worse off (Harvey, 2005).
Thinking beyond neo-liberalism: A response to Detlev Zwick
To do critical theory used to be fairly straightforward. The existing order of things – Global Capitalism, Consumer Society, Late Capitalism or State Monopoly Capitalism – could be criticized for its shortcomings in relation to an actually existing alternative. This alternative did not have to be fully realized to exist. It was enough that the ideas that it embodied (socialism, free love, authentic human relationships) moved the imaginations of a multitude of people for the alternative to be real (at least in the Hegelian sense of that term).
From humanity to nationality to bestiality: A polemic on alternatives without conclusion
World Stock Markets in Turmoil (Guardian, 5/8/11)
Collapse of Neoliberal Ideology (Harvey and Milburn, in Guardian, 5/8/11)
State of Emergency (Guardian, 5/8/11)